Analytical Lord Jesus Christ

I’ve read a few times in Barth about the difference of interpreting things synthetically and analytically. For example: “The words ‘Lord Jesus Christ’ (Phil 2.11, 1 Cor 12.3, Rm 10.9) also are to be interpreted not synthetically but analytically–the name Jesus Christ is as such the name of the Lord.” (I/2, 10) And, of course, every time I read this distinction, I was blurred as I didn’t know what it was supposed to mean. Never did I know that the analytic-synthetic distinction is a well-known conceptual distinction in philosophy which was originated by Kant. Analytic proposition basically means that the predicate is contained in the subject, while synthetic proposition means that the predicate is not contained in the subject. In this case, it means that the word ‘Lord’ found its true meaning in the name of Jesus Christ.

(Anyway, I guess it confirms that to appreciate Barth (nay, anyone) better, one must also consider his (or her) philosophical influences.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s